miércoles, 27 de mayo de 2009

Analytical Essay

Cristina Vera González
Language IX
Crystal Hickerson
27 May 2009

How To Teach Grammar

Sheila Wright, Robin Albretch, Morgan Blanton, and Stephanie Bogaert, in their “Strategies for Teaching Grammar in Context”, argue that “the most effective way to teach grammar is by teaching it in the contexts of students’ own writing”. After reading and analyzing their argument, I shall argue that, eventhough they base their opinions on different authors’ statements, which are not totally reliable since there is not information provided about who those authors are and also about their occupations, they provide a compelling argument based on research and tips for teachers which explains that teaching grammar in context is more effective than teaching it in isolation.

In order to develop their statement for the teaching of grammar within the context where students are writing, the authors, after gathering information provided by other authors, they support their idea by including implications of their theory, including strategies and advice for teachers such as conferencing and teaching minilessons. Further concern is found in the fact that teachers may be interested to know what this grammar into practice would look like in their own classrooms in order to know how students’ authentic writing work in class, since teaching grammar in this way “is the key for transferring the knowledge into their own writing.” Finally, the authors agree on the idea that, after researching formal and informal grammar, both types should be taught within students’ contexts.

What makes these findings more reliable in terms of teachers’ needs according to what the authors point out, is that based on the research they did, they give teachers recommendations in order to make the process more meaningful. They say that teaching grammar in context can be done by “conferencing and teaching minilessons basedon authentic students’ writing.” They also claim that this process work depending on the students’ needs. They advice teachers to conference with students about their writing skills, then, after have gathered enough information; they would be able to use it for minilessons which mean a real benefit for students in terms of the feedback that they can receive.


Even though the authors support their statement with different and very strong thoughts from other authors, in terms of evidence, they fail to show studies or figures which may help the readers understand why it is more udeful and more effective to teach grammar in context that teaching it in isolation.

While I think that this is a reasonable concern for teachers to as themselves why is it more effective to teach grammar in context that teaching it in isolation as the authors of this article state, I do not think that this is a reliable enough work where people can find reasons and relevant evidence for what the authors argue. Nonetheless, the information provided by the other authors existent in the text, opens a space for critical thinking and further discussion and research.

So, even if one thinks that the authors are a bit careless on the quality of their research, I think that they put the effort on discussing and providing information from other authors which support their idea on teaching grammar in context for developing students’ writing skills, althought they should have shown research done in school to demonstrate how effective is what they state.

References:

Wright, S. et, al. “Strategies for Teaching Grammar in Context.” UNCC (June, 2006).

2 comentarios:

C Hickerson dijo...

Cristina Vera González
Language IX
Crystal Hickerson
27 May 2009

How To Teach Grammar

Sheila Wright, Robin Albretch, Morgan Blanton, and Stephanie Bogaert, in their “Strategies for Teaching Grammar in Context”, argue that “the most effective way to teach grammar is by teaching it in the contexts of students’ own writing”. After reading and analyzing their argument, I shall argue that, eventhough S they base their opinions on different authors’ statements, which are not totally reliable since there is not information provided about who those authors are and also about their occupations, they provide a compelling argument based on research and tips for teachers which explains that teaching grammar in context is more effective than teaching it in isolation. ((This last sentence is really long. Consider breaking it up.))

In order to develop their statement for the teaching of grammar within the context *of students'* writing, the authors, after gathering information provided by other authors, (they) support their idea by including implications WW of their theory, including strategies and advice for teachers such as conferencing and teaching minilessons. Further concern ((on your part, or on the part of the authors?)) is found in the fact that teachers may be interested to know what this grammar in* practice would look like in their own classrooms in order to know how students’ authentic writing works* in class, since teaching grammar in this way “is the key for transferring the knowledge into their own writing.” ((The meaning of this last sentence is unclear.)) Finally, the authors agree on the idea that, after researching formal and informal grammar, both types should be taught within students’ contexts.

What makes these findings more reliable in terms of teachers’ needs according to what the authors point out, is that based on the research they did, they give teachers recommendations in order to make the process more meaningful. ((Again, this sentence has so many prepositional phrases that the meaning becomes lost. Work on expressing yourself in a clearer, more economical manner)) They say that teaching grammar in context can be done by “conferencing and teaching minilessons basedon S authentic students’ writing.” They also claim that this process work C depending on the students’ needs. They advice WW teachers to conference with students about their writing skills, then, after have WF gathered enough information; P they would be able to use it for minilessons S which means* a real benefit for students in terms of the feedback that they can receive.

C Hickerson dijo...

Even though the authors support their statement WW with different and very strong thoughts from other authors, (in terms of evidence,) they fail to show studies or figures which may help the readers understand why it is more udeful S and more effective to teach grammar in context that WW teaching it in isolation. ((This paragraph--your critique--is one sentence! You must develop your criticism, justify yourself. What kind of evidence is missing? Why aren't their sources sufficient?))

While I think that this is a reasonable concern for teachers to as themselves ?M why is it more effective to teach grammar in context that WW teaching it in isolation as the authors of this article state, I do not think that this is a reliable enough work where people can find reasons and relevant evidence for what the authors argue. Nonetheless, the information provided by the other authors existent in the text(,) opens a space for critical thinking and further discussion and research.

So, ((informal)) even if one thinks that the authors are a bit careless on the quality of their research, I think that they put (the) effort on WW discussing and providing information from other authors which support their idea on teaching grammar in context for developing students’ writing skills, althought S they should have shown research done in school to demonstrate how effective *is what they state.* WO

Overall, good organization, but you must expound on your critique more. That might require you to cut back on some summary. Another thing to focus on here is making your sentences clearer. Throughout the text, you write long, complex sentences that are either trying to say too much at one time or simply fail to produce a cohesive meaning. I would focus on rewriting those, breaking them up into shorter sentences whose meaning is clear, but that still relate one to the other.